The fitness we seek to instill into our athletes comes from "constantly varied movements executed at relative high intensity".*CrossFit recognises that the compound movements (movements employing more than one skeletal joint) need to be taught and consequently re-taught, or at the very least revisited each time before our workouts.
The functional movements we employ have "points of performance" and all of these need to be adhered in order to move well, thusly improving fitness and the avoidance of injury. Some potential clients approach us and say "how much is a class? others say "I want to learn CrossFit-show me how?"
Everybody that comes to us to train will start their education with the basic fundamentals of functional movement, and learn these before they join classes. This is how we start your training at CrossFit Hove.
"Mechanics, consistency-then relative intensity"*
This of course raises the question of intensity, and its relation to scalabilty for differing clients, dependent on fitness, conditioning, possible movement issues and age. The workouts we do are scaled and suited to the ability of the individual.
"The fitness needs between olympic athletes and our grandparents differ by degree not by kind."*
Quotes from CrossFit creator Coach Greg Glassman. Further reading can be found by clicking on the CrossFit Journal link.
Sunday, 28 February 2010
Saturday, 27 February 2010
Nasty girls
Deads n stuff.
Tuesday, 23 February 2010
Form follows function
What do we look for in our fitness?
To directly answer this we need to think about a definition of fitness, aspects of movement that we need, ability to be flexible yet strong (as opposed to weak) cardio endurance with power, speed with coordination and accuracy, and stamina with agility.
What occurs if we specialise in one energy pathway at the bereft of the others, what about if we isolate our musculature yet twist our back unloading the washing machine?
In CrossFit we seek to address general physical skills combining all of the ten points in the first paragraph, and use all our energy pathways and train compound multi-joint movements. We do this because it is functional for life. Fitness should not be the pursuit of an asthetic, it needs to be defined as the ability to perform tasks quickly and efficiently and the tasks are often variable as is the nature of human existance. Choosing not to squat or deadlift because nobody sees your legs is an inherently weak statement, it suggests narcissistic vanity more unattractive than a skinny leg. We are bipeds, if we cease to lose that ability our quality of life is severly diminished.
If training for appearance is what defines your fitness then how do you know how fit you are? Is it measurable? Does it involve any data-does your mirror have a score card system?
We train functional movements, this is defined as GPP (general physical preparedness) or the ability to perform well at any or every task imaginable. Thusly our training sytem is a constantly varied programme involving many different stimuli, we do this as nature very seldom gives us tasks that are periodized with rest phases and sets. We train to be better at life and consequently the movements we utilise focus on what will keep us functional as opposed an appearance of fitness.
CrossFit is a training system designed to enhance the individuals quality of life. The individual themselves addressing what is important, whether its a 2.14 Fran time, increasing general fitness for their sport or martial art, or having the ability to pull or push themselves upright if they fall or sit without the need of an aide to do so.
The search for the asthetic in fitness will highlight weaknesses in the individual when their fitness is needed to be functional, the same as the quest for great strength yet indulging in a diminished range of movement will always be a flawed strength.
The purpose of an increased fitness is to create a better quality of life and this needs to be done via functional movements. The use of isolation machines, mirrors and shallow squats will not achieve this, nor should the inexperienced individual be fooled into thinking that it will.
To directly answer this we need to think about a definition of fitness, aspects of movement that we need, ability to be flexible yet strong (as opposed to weak) cardio endurance with power, speed with coordination and accuracy, and stamina with agility.
What occurs if we specialise in one energy pathway at the bereft of the others, what about if we isolate our musculature yet twist our back unloading the washing machine?
In CrossFit we seek to address general physical skills combining all of the ten points in the first paragraph, and use all our energy pathways and train compound multi-joint movements. We do this because it is functional for life. Fitness should not be the pursuit of an asthetic, it needs to be defined as the ability to perform tasks quickly and efficiently and the tasks are often variable as is the nature of human existance. Choosing not to squat or deadlift because nobody sees your legs is an inherently weak statement, it suggests narcissistic vanity more unattractive than a skinny leg. We are bipeds, if we cease to lose that ability our quality of life is severly diminished.
If training for appearance is what defines your fitness then how do you know how fit you are? Is it measurable? Does it involve any data-does your mirror have a score card system?
We train functional movements, this is defined as GPP (general physical preparedness) or the ability to perform well at any or every task imaginable. Thusly our training sytem is a constantly varied programme involving many different stimuli, we do this as nature very seldom gives us tasks that are periodized with rest phases and sets. We train to be better at life and consequently the movements we utilise focus on what will keep us functional as opposed an appearance of fitness.
CrossFit is a training system designed to enhance the individuals quality of life. The individual themselves addressing what is important, whether its a 2.14 Fran time, increasing general fitness for their sport or martial art, or having the ability to pull or push themselves upright if they fall or sit without the need of an aide to do so.
The search for the asthetic in fitness will highlight weaknesses in the individual when their fitness is needed to be functional, the same as the quest for great strength yet indulging in a diminished range of movement will always be a flawed strength.
The purpose of an increased fitness is to create a better quality of life and this needs to be done via functional movements. The use of isolation machines, mirrors and shallow squats will not achieve this, nor should the inexperienced individual be fooled into thinking that it will.
Sunday, 21 February 2010
Friday, 19 February 2010
In 3 minutes.
Monday, 15 February 2010
3D
After classes,we headed up to Manchester for the opening of CrossFit 3D, Karl Steadmans new box.
It is quite awesome. It was great to see so many affiliates from different parts of the country make the effort to support Karl's new venture. Unfortunately we missed Andy from CrossFit Reading and Graham and Lorraine from CrossFit Dental.
From left to right is David from CrossFit Intensity in Leicester, Davie from CrossFit Central Scotland in Motherwell, Jami from Thames CrossFit, Karl, Kempie from CrossFit Northeast in Newcastle, Melissa and Simon from CrossFit Central Manchester and Matthew from Crossfit Velocity in Swansea. We wish Karl (and his wife Rachael) every success with their new venture and look forward to seeing them again soon.
It is quite awesome. It was great to see so many affiliates from different parts of the country make the effort to support Karl's new venture. Unfortunately we missed Andy from CrossFit Reading and Graham and Lorraine from CrossFit Dental.
From left to right is David from CrossFit Intensity in Leicester, Davie from CrossFit Central Scotland in Motherwell, Jami from Thames CrossFit, Karl, Kempie from CrossFit Northeast in Newcastle, Melissa and Simon from CrossFit Central Manchester and Matthew from Crossfit Velocity in Swansea. We wish Karl (and his wife Rachael) every success with their new venture and look forward to seeing them again soon.
5, 20 for ten
Front squat
3x5
or
5x3
Hi rep back squat
1x15+
5 push jerk
20 double unders
amrap 10 minutes.
A note on scaling
The push jerk on this wod was ideally 15kg below bodyweight, thusly is if you weigh 75kg you would lift 60, or 50kg, 35kg. If you are new, or this lift is not your best, we scale the weight, looking for better form as opposed to allowing movement which would prevent it. The policy of "mechanics, consistency, intensity is prevalent in how we train. Good movement is essential to what we do, only when we see this do we add greater intensity.
3x5
or
5x3
Hi rep back squat
1x15+
5 push jerk
20 double unders
amrap 10 minutes.
A note on scaling
The push jerk on this wod was ideally 15kg below bodyweight, thusly is if you weigh 75kg you would lift 60, or 50kg, 35kg. If you are new, or this lift is not your best, we scale the weight, looking for better form as opposed to allowing movement which would prevent it. The policy of "mechanics, consistency, intensity is prevalent in how we train. Good movement is essential to what we do, only when we see this do we add greater intensity.
Thursday, 11 February 2010
Don't be a Dufus!
A client of our's sister was interested in joining us at CFH, but was worried that she wouldn't be
fit enough to start-so she joined a globo gym-FAIL! If you want to join CrossFit Hove, we start your workouts small, everybody has different fitness levels and we tailor the workout to the individual, teaching the mechanics, making sure they move consistently before we introduce intensity. Our workouts are infinitely scalable, delivering improved fitness regardless of your own level of fitness. Don't be a Dufus.
fit enough to start-so she joined a globo gym-FAIL! If you want to join CrossFit Hove, we start your workouts small, everybody has different fitness levels and we tailor the workout to the individual, teaching the mechanics, making sure they move consistently before we introduce intensity. Our workouts are infinitely scalable, delivering improved fitness regardless of your own level of fitness. Don't be a Dufus.
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
Wednesday
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
5,3,3,1,1,1,1.
Week six of the CFSB and back squat went well, everybody is lifting heavier and they've seen a natural progression across the six weeks of the programme. The question we have to ask is, has this improved us as athletes who measure fitness across broad time and modal domains or are we just stronger in these lifts.
Strength is one of the ten factors of fitness but if we lose our flexibility, or endurance, or stamina has the programme served its purpose? The answer to this is to retest all the metcon workout performed in the first weak and measure our improvements (if any) after working our strength bias.
Our fitness needs to be a measurable quantity, seeking improvements along the way, and it has to be multifaceted as well, each client having an aim or mission whether its improved performance, weight loss or performing movements with increased range to enhance their own functionality. The fitness we strive to deliver is so adaptable and movements so scalable that we can deliver all these things, and enrich lives in the process.
Strength is one of the ten factors of fitness but if we lose our flexibility, or endurance, or stamina has the programme served its purpose? The answer to this is to retest all the metcon workout performed in the first weak and measure our improvements (if any) after working our strength bias.
Our fitness needs to be a measurable quantity, seeking improvements along the way, and it has to be multifaceted as well, each client having an aim or mission whether its improved performance, weight loss or performing movements with increased range to enhance their own functionality. The fitness we strive to deliver is so adaptable and movements so scalable that we can deliver all these things, and enrich lives in the process.
Saturday, 6 February 2010
Friday, 5 February 2010
Friday
Front squat
3x5
or
5x3
No hi rep squat in week 5 and no metcon either in the CFSB-so we did two rounds of fight gone bad.
I got a phone call today from someone who'd done a google search for gyms in Hove, and he asked "Are you a gym". The answer really depends on what constitutes a gym, and what you would expect to find in a gym, and how you perceive fitness.
We train people, they join us and they learn new or refine existing movements. We seek to improve people and they come to us to to pursue this improvement, charting, monitoring and watching progress in fitness along the way. We don't run a policy of wander in and do the bits you like, or gaze upon yourself in a mirror, or read a magazine/watch television whilst on an elliptical or treadmill.
Our fitness demands learning, listening and being coachable, following advice as well as eating better and getting sufficient rest. All of these points lead to a better fitness that is "measurable, observable and repeatable".
If you want to go to a gym to avoid improvement, not see results and not find what fitness is actually about-go somewhere else.
3x5
or
5x3
No hi rep squat in week 5 and no metcon either in the CFSB-so we did two rounds of fight gone bad.
I got a phone call today from someone who'd done a google search for gyms in Hove, and he asked "Are you a gym". The answer really depends on what constitutes a gym, and what you would expect to find in a gym, and how you perceive fitness.
We train people, they join us and they learn new or refine existing movements. We seek to improve people and they come to us to to pursue this improvement, charting, monitoring and watching progress in fitness along the way. We don't run a policy of wander in and do the bits you like, or gaze upon yourself in a mirror, or read a magazine/watch television whilst on an elliptical or treadmill.
Our fitness demands learning, listening and being coachable, following advice as well as eating better and getting sufficient rest. All of these points lead to a better fitness that is "measurable, observable and repeatable".
If you want to go to a gym to avoid improvement, not see results and not find what fitness is actually about-go somewhere else.
Thursday, 4 February 2010
Push Jerk
Push jerk
5x3
metcon
7 sumo deadlifts hi pulls
12 pressups
30 skips
amrap
10 minutes
This came up when scrutinising the push jerk, aiming for Dip, drive and drop, you gotta get up (hip opening-hard) to get down, (hip partially closes to get under the bar)-Coolio explains it best
5x3
metcon
7 sumo deadlifts hi pulls
12 pressups
30 skips
amrap
10 minutes
This came up when scrutinising the push jerk, aiming for Dip, drive and drop, you gotta get up (hip opening-hard) to get down, (hip partially closes to get under the bar)-Coolio explains it best
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
Deads and Muscle ups
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
Monday, 1 February 2010
Saturday
Press
3x 5 or 5x3
12-9-6 or 12x1
Two wods were "offered"
"Nicole"
as many pullups as possible, run 400 m-capped to 15 minutes
"Kelly-esque"
15 wall ball
15 box jumps
run 400
amrap 15 minutes.
There was really no choice, those who did the front squat back squat on friday night did Nicole, those who didnt got Kelly (albeit a scaled version of the benchmark wod)
This sees the end of our fourth week on the CFSB, so we have another two weeks then its time to revisit the benchmarks we set out for ourselves in week one and check progress accordingly. As a trainer I'm very pleased with the progress being made with strength whilst at the same time not visibly loosing any fitness in our athletes. As a side effect everybody seems confident with the lifts and excellent form and depth of movement is being maintained, there is no point getting heavier at the loss of good movement for the sake of a pb.
3x 5 or 5x3
12-9-6 or 12x1
Two wods were "offered"
"Nicole"
as many pullups as possible, run 400 m-capped to 15 minutes
"Kelly-esque"
15 wall ball
15 box jumps
run 400
amrap 15 minutes.
There was really no choice, those who did the front squat back squat on friday night did Nicole, those who didnt got Kelly (albeit a scaled version of the benchmark wod)
This sees the end of our fourth week on the CFSB, so we have another two weeks then its time to revisit the benchmarks we set out for ourselves in week one and check progress accordingly. As a trainer I'm very pleased with the progress being made with strength whilst at the same time not visibly loosing any fitness in our athletes. As a side effect everybody seems confident with the lifts and excellent form and depth of movement is being maintained, there is no point getting heavier at the loss of good movement for the sake of a pb.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)